WI: Milwaukee may dramatically loosen sex offender residency restrictions

The City of Milwaukee may dramatically loosen its residency restrictions for sex offenders.

The city’s current ordinance bans many sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of places like schools, parks, and day care centers. A measure set to be considered Monday by the Common Council would reduce that “buffer” to 500 feet. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What a bunch of morons. First, changing an illegal 2000′ restriction to an illegal 500′ restriction is still an illegal restriction. Second, what happened to needing it for public safety? I guess all the sudden that extra 1500′ isn’t needed? Oh wait, it’s about dodging a lawsuit. In other words, citizens of Milwaukee, your “leaders” are more worried about money than your children! (Assuming the restrictions actually help kids, of course.) Third, “these people” are, gasp!, people! Just like anyone else who has paid their debt to society for their offense, they deserve restoration of constitutional rights. Fourth, what sort of sex-offender issues has the city suffered in those “sex offender hot spots”? Other than people not liking “these people” living near them, I’m guessing none, or at least no more than places with few or zero restrictions. Like I said, what a bunch of morons.

From Wisconsin; I am watching changes both forward and backward in other states. In Wisconsin we seem to be close to a turning point in some areas. We see a win with residency restrictions here, as well as loses in other areas in the state. We have lifetime GPS for some. Civil commitment. The difference in our recent success (as I see it) is the Illinois lawyers who have begun to fight on our behalf. California is getting solid positive traction which benefits all. I wish we had a collective national effort to organize these fights in all states. Another city in Wisconsin just passed positive changes to our distance restriction. (1500 to 500) The legislation also quotes legislation from Smith & Doe and other state’s legislative actions.
http://www.newberlin.org/documentcenter/view/6808
They also formed a board of review for allowing “offenders” into the 500 ft residency zone. I assume to deflect a potential lawsuit. I’ve only seen positive change when a municipality is rocked back onto it’s heels. The popular opinion is not changing enough due to politics and media. We are the cash cow for these entities.
With 800,000 strong we are also a potential cash cow for the organization which goes national with fights in 50 states. (guess 49 since California is doing nicely).